A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Javier Armando Suarez Pascagaza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por impertinente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Con el presente auto se RECHAZA, por impertinente, la recusación formulada por el representante legal de la Fundación Marido y Mujer contra los magistrados María Victoria Calle Correa, Alejandro Linares Cantillo, Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio, Alberto Rojas Ríos y Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por impertinente la recusacion formulada por el ciudadano Javier Armando Suarez Pascagaza contra los Magistrados Maria Victoria Calle Correa, Alejandro Linares Cantillo, Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, Alberto Rojas Rios y Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
- Segundo. Contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.